Comments on: Depreciating the Declinations of Depression

By: matt

matt — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:33:50 +0000

Eventually you’ll end your elongated absence and educate us with an enumeration of elementary excuses which enticed such an effect, right?

By: King Dave B. the 3rd Sr.

King Dave B. the 3rd Sr. — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:44:28 +0000

i was drunk as a skunk when i posed that crap, sorry man.

By: jimbotwain

jimbotwain — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 19:42:57 +0000

Or you could say that I’m depreciating over time, in the financial sense, a large feeling of personal declination caused by depression. Depreciation, in and of itself, does not increase anything, it simply spreads it out over time to not be completely overwhelmed by it’s rather large one time cost. Don’t challenge my titles…. they rarely make sense, but I think I can explain this one away.

By: King Dave B. the 3rd Sr.

King Dave B. the 3rd Sr. — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:15:44 +0000

your shit isnt posting my comments

By: King Dave B. the 3rd Sr.

King Dave B. the 3rd Sr. — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:15:05 +0000

If you are deprecating the declinations of something, then you are basically increasing them, or at least slowing their declination down. Because if the decline of something is only drawn out over a longer period of time, then that =’s more of that something. So I would demand the societal de-regulation of the declination of depression, via less TV watching and such. That way, eventually, way more depressed people would make you feel better about your situation relatively. So the really depressed people would go bonkers, while other peeps hang in there. Or even better, the declination of the depression would even reverse,.

Or, if I read that wrong, you are not appreciating the ammount of declination happening. In that case, you are one of those people that would make someone else feel better about themselves.

OR you’re some twisted hedge fund manager betting on the fact that there are other dudes like you out there.

Or, I’m way stuck on your alliteration, not realizing that I should just say, I’m dumb, or drunk.

By: King Dave B. the 3rd Sr.

King Dave B. the 3rd Sr. — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:07:33 +0000

If you are depricating the declinations of somethings, then you are basically increasing them, or at least slowing their declination down. Because if the decline of something is only drawn out over a longer period of time, then that =’s more of that something. So I would demand the societal de-regulation of the declination of depression, via less TV watching and such. That way, eventually, way more depressed people would make you feel better about your situation relatively. So the really depressed people would go bonkers, while other peeps hang in there. Or even better, the declination of the depression would even reverse, or inverse?

Or, if I read that wrong, you are not appreciating the ammount of declination happening. In that case, you are one of those people that would make someone else feel better about themselves.

OR you’re some twisted hedge fund manager betting on the fact that there are other dudes like you out there.

Or, I’m way stuck on your alliteration, not realizing that I should just say, I’m dumb.

Either way, hang in there man, yeah.

By: King Dave B. the 3rd Sr.

King Dave B. the 3rd Sr. — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:58:01 +0000

On the positive tip, you’re at the Eeees. which means you can say “Eatin’ other editors with each and every energetic
Epileptic episode, (with)elevated etiquette”

the Gift of Gab was all about the E’s

The alliteration should work out quite well once passed the Deees.

PS…let me remind you that you may have a house and a job and all that jazz, but when’s the last time you’ve had bacon and waffles, at the same time????

By: TJBJ

TJBJ — Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:35:19 +0000

Tett and Roper have spent this week trying to teach Mel’s students how to avoid being a single 20-something male who never talks to women. Tett was very direct, saying, “do you want to end up like us? go talk to girls!”